Update e2e report with workflow failure root cause
This commit is contained in:
@@ -63,6 +63,9 @@ Runtime notes from the run:
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
- `sqlite-vec` fell back to table-backed storage repeatedly.
|
- `sqlite-vec` fell back to table-backed storage repeatedly.
|
||||||
- workflow-local reported `concurrency limit (1) reached`.
|
- workflow-local reported `concurrency limit (1) reached`.
|
||||||
|
- Live server logs repeatedly failed background filing workflows with:
|
||||||
|
- `SQLiteError: table filing_taxonomy_snapshot has no column named parser_engine`
|
||||||
|
- Inference: the local/e2e database schema is behind the code path used by filing taxonomy persistence.
|
||||||
- The suite completed in about 1.2 minutes before failing.
|
- The suite completed in about 1.2 minutes before failing.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Manual Workflow Findings
|
## Manual Workflow Findings
|
||||||
@@ -72,6 +75,7 @@ Runtime notes from the run:
|
|||||||
- Overview page does not distinguish loading vs failure vs empty data.
|
- Overview page does not distinguish loading vs failure vs empty data.
|
||||||
- Visiting `/analysis` rendered the full page shell but stayed on `Loading company overview`.
|
- Visiting `/analysis` rendered the full page shell but stayed on `Loading company overview`.
|
||||||
- The user gets no timeout, error explanation, retry guidance, or indication that background filing tasks failed.
|
- The user gets no timeout, error explanation, retry guidance, or indication that background filing tasks failed.
|
||||||
|
- The local server logs showed repeated filing workflow failures caused by a schema mismatch on `filing_taxonomy_snapshot.parser_engine`, which likely contributes directly to this broken state.
|
||||||
- This is a broken primary workflow, not just a cosmetic state issue.
|
- This is a broken primary workflow, not just a cosmetic state issue.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- Auth confidence is too low.
|
- Auth confidence is too low.
|
||||||
@@ -87,6 +91,7 @@ Runtime notes from the run:
|
|||||||
- Notification spam degrades every workflow.
|
- Notification spam degrades every workflow.
|
||||||
- Coverage creation and navigation produced stacked `Filing sync` toasts.
|
- Coverage creation and navigation produced stacked `Filing sync` toasts.
|
||||||
- Multiple toasts showed nearly identical states and remained visible across pages.
|
- Multiple toasts showed nearly identical states and remained visible across pages.
|
||||||
|
- Because failed background jobs keep retrying or re-reporting progress, the user sees noise instead of one durable status surface.
|
||||||
- The notifications panel becomes ambient noise instead of actionable feedback.
|
- The notifications panel becomes ambient noise instead of actionable feedback.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- Coverage actions can trigger expensive side effects without clear consent.
|
- Coverage actions can trigger expensive side effects without clear consent.
|
||||||
|
|||||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user